RE: E-mail is correct, email isn't

Subject: RE: E-mail is correct, email isn't
From: "RUBOTTOM, AL" <ARUBOTTOM -at- SENSORMATIC -dot- COM>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 14:44:20 -0800

from the POV of WIRED's style claims, there's a discussion on this very
topic:

http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,39450,00.html


> -----Original Message-----
> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 10:58 AM
> To: TECHWR-L
> Subject: E-mail is correct, email isn't
>

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Learn how to develop HTML-based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver!
Dec. 7-8, 2000, Orlando, FL -- $100 discount for STC members.
http://www.weisner.com/training/dreamweaver_help.htm or 800-646-9989.

Sponsored by SOLUTIONS, Conferences and Seminars for Communicators
Publications Management Clinic, TECH*COMM 2001 Conference, and more
http://www.SolutionsEvents.com or 800-448-4230

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Ballot usability / information design
Next by Author: RE: tech writer bookshelf/Tufte
Previous by Thread: Re: E-mail is correct, email isn't
Next by Thread: FW: E-mail is correct, email isn't


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads