RE: 'Stereotype' thread - evolved.

Subject: RE: 'Stereotype' thread - evolved.
From: BMcClain -at- centura -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 15:03:33 -0500

-----Original Message-----
From: bogucki91030 -at- yahoo -dot- com [mailto:bogucki91030 -at- yahoo -dot- com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 2:00 PM
Subject: RE: 'Stereotype' thread - evolved.

I agree totally with Mike. I read a professional-type
newsletter the other day (I won't say which one - but
it was communication-related) which included a note
that 'irregardless' does actually appear in some
dictionaries and thus cannot TOTALLY be considered
wrong anymore. (shudder)


I've had a hard time seeing any point to the "don't split infinitives" rule
ever since I first noticed James T. Kirk proposed "to boldly go where no man
has gone before." :o)

Develop HTML-based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver! (STC Discount.)
**NEW DATE/LOCATION!** January 16-17, 2001, New York, NY. or 800-646-9989.

Sponsored by SOLUTIONS, Conferences and Seminars for Communicators
Publications Management Clinic, TECH*COMM 2001 Conference, and more or 800-448-4230

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Here's why formatting and layout can really matter:
Next by Author: RE: Here's why formatting and layout can really matter:
Previous by Thread: RE: 'Stereotype' thread - evolved.
Next by Thread: Re: 'Stereotype' thread - evolved.

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads