TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Significant digits? Take II From:"Hart, Geoff" <Geoff-H -at- MTL -dot- FERIC -dot- CA> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Tue, 14 Nov 2000 08:34:34 -0500
Katie Kearns, responding to my tongue in cheek "my colleague with a PhD in
statistics agreed with me. So there!", observed: <<Bah.. what does a
statistician know? ;) >>
"Lies, damn lies, and statistics?" Extra points if you know the source of
the quote. <g> (Actually, the author is eluding me right now. It'll come to
<<The zeros to the left don't count. (See other responses discussing the
Though it's true that zeros _often_ don't count as significant figures, you
have to look beyond that simple rule. If the number is 0.00123, and no other
numbers are involved that have a different pattern (i.e., all numbers
resemble 0.00XYZ), then there's no question that there are only three
significant figures: X, Y, and Z. But let's say you have two or more numbers
with different patterns: if the author presents 0.00123 and 0.04123, the
picture changes dramatically: now the first number actually has four
significant figures, to match the number used in the second number. Using
the logic expressed for scientific notation, the numbers become 0.123x10^-2,
and 4.123x10^-2, and it's clear that both have four significant figures, not
three. (Whether the second number should have been rounded to three figures
is a different discussion; it might well have to be, depending on the
"Arthur C. Clarke had suggested that any sufficiently advanced technology
would be indistinguishable from magic--referring to a possible encounter
with an alien civilization--but if a science journalist had one
responsibility above all else, it was to keep Clarke's Law from applying to
human technology in human eyes."--Greg Egan, "Distress"
Sponsored by SOLUTIONS, Conferences and Seminars for Communicators
Publications Management Clinic, TECH*COMM 2001 Conference, and more http://www.SolutionsEvents.com or 800-448-4230
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.