TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
> My point is, none of my clients would want to hire someone who writes
> flaming material. If that's a sample of their professional writing
> ability (and I, as a recruiter, have a right to consider it such),
> then my clients will likely have no need for them.
First, Internet message boards do not, in my opinion, constitute a
"professional environment." The Internet is a notoriously deceptive
environment. As such all Internet posting must be met with a certain amount of
skepticism. What a person writes on the Internet is rarely a good picture of
that person in reality.
Hence, I think the point a lot of us are expressing, David, is that your
criteria for judging writers based on Internet postings is remarkably shallow.
It has tones of unfairness and discrimination. Synonymous to saying somebody
is a bad writer because they have a foreign accent or ware ugly shoes.
I am a writer and a recruiter too. I want people who can get the job done and
deliver quality work to my clients. I don't much care about their opinions.
Yes, there is a limit to being self-absorbed or overly opinionated. Assuming
somebody who expresses an opinion YOU, PERSONALLY judge as "flaming" is a bad
writer, does a tremendous disservice to your clients.
I feel it is best to deal with candidates on a individual basis. Look at a
whole person and not just a tiny fraction of their life. There are plenty of
forms of expression I find distasteful about some candidates. I recently
interviewed some guy who works for this right-wing political group I loathe.
Yeah, the guy probably shouldn't advertise that - but so what. I'm not
evaluating his dogma, I am evaluating his writing skills.
Nobody is saying don't use your instincts. But rejecting a person because of
some nasty Internet messages is a very flimsy basis for a judgment.
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Get organized for the holidays! http://calendar.yahoo.com/
Sponsored by SOLUTIONS, Conferences and Seminars for Communicators
Publications Management Clinic, TECH*COMM 2001 Conference, and more http://www.SolutionsEvents.com or 800-448-4230
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.