TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:A challenge to Andrew From:"Tim Altom" <taltom -at- simplywritten -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Tue, 28 Nov 2000 07:44:04 -0500
Tell you what, Andrew...I'm in the mood to issue a challenge. You write
interminably about how "a good writer", which I take to mean "Andrew Plato",
has mastery of these four things:
1) Technical Accuracy
3) Writer's technical expertise
4) Style (how can it make documents more interesting).
(I should let pass the urge to editorially remind you that a numbered list
should be used for ordinal objects, unless you meant that these were ordered
by importance. But I won't. I'm really in a challenging mood.)
I challenge you to test your assertions. You make them often, with great
vehemence and heat, but to date I have seen no actual data to buttress any
of them. You claim that single source almost always equals crap, which I
take to mean that the outcome is not highly usable. I'd be interested to see
if you can live up to the golden goal you've set for yourself...usability.
That's the test, right? You say so yourself, ad nauseum. Although perhaps
not in that precise word: Usability. That's what you pride yourself on,
though...interesting documents that ultimately benefit the user. You pound
the drum unceasingly that it's the writer, it's the writer, it's the writer,
it's the writer, and that nothing else matters, and that anything that
interferes with the True Professional is so much mud underfoot.
So let's test it. If you fancy yourself one of those marvelous writers, then
submit one of your sparkling contributions to our industry to a rigorous
usability test. A usability member of this list can volunteer to conduct the
actual tests. Let's see if your methods are as breathtakingly effective as
you claim. Then let's put the results on the list. Opinions are like
nostrils: everybody has at least two. But in my book, "In God we trust...all
others provide supporting data". You are vociferous in your denunciations of
anybody's working style but your own. Prove you're better. Prove it in the
only arena that counts. Put numbers on it.
Simply Written, Inc.
Featuring FrameMaker and the Clustar(TM) System
"Better communication is a service to mankind."
Check our Web site for the upcoming Clustar class info http://www.simplywritten.com
Sponsored by SOLUTIONS, Conferences and Seminars for Communicators
Publications Management Clinic, TECH*COMM 2001 Conference, and more http://www.SolutionsEvents.com or 800-448-4230
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.