Re: Quality docs (was Re value etc)

Subject: Re: Quality docs (was Re value etc)
From: Andrew Plato <intrepid_es -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 10:02:37 -0800 (PST)

"Damien Braniff" wrote..

> I think the point Andrew is trying to make is that because a system is
> consistent doesn't make it good.
> Good work + poor system = poor output
> Good work + good system = good output
> poor work + good system = poor output
> poor work + poor system = poor output

That is correct. Even if a system is reliable and comprehensive, does not mean
it will produce good work. Intelligent people still must command the means of
production, to borrow from my Marxist friends.

Also, I think Good work + poor system = satisfactory output.

Good writers should be able to produce at least reasonably decent output in a
less than ideal environment.

Andrew Plato

Not for Mom:

Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.

Develop HTML-based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver! (STC Discount.)
**NEW DATE/LOCATION!** January 16-17, 2001, New York, NY. or 800-646-9989.

Sponsored by SOLUTIONS, Conferences and Seminars for Communicators
Publications Management Clinic, TECH*COMM 2001 Conference, and more or 800-448-4230

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Re: Real Value??
Next by Author: Less Real Value is More
Previous by Thread: RE: Quality docs (was Re value etc)
Next by Thread: Re: Quality docs (was Re value etc)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads