Re: Pseudowriters

Subject: Re: Pseudowriters
From: Mike Stockman <stockman -at- jagunet -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 19:28:14 -0500

On 12/26/00 2:26 PM, bgranat -at- att -dot- net (bgranat -at- att -dot- net) wrote:

>Nobody is advocating not understanding the topic. The assumption among
>professionals is that the technical writer understands the topic.

You're right -- nobody is "advocating" that. Unfortunately, it's
widespread anyway. I think Andrew's position (and please, correct me if
I'm wrong) stems from the same experiences I've had: many, many writers
in our profession cannot, or will not, master the subject about which
they're writing. Without that, *all* other efforts are wasted.

My advice to clients has always been "When your writers know the material
and can discuss it accurately, then we can spend time about processes,
standards, and other secondary tasks."

They almost never hit that goal, because they insist on spending their
time developing brilliant processes and style guides that let them
publish beautiful, efficient, inaccurate, and incomplete material.

----->Mike

________________________________________________________________
stockman -at- jagunet -dot- com -- AOL and AOL Instant Messenger:MStockman


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Develop HTML-based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver! (STC Discount.)
**NEW DATE/LOCATION!** January 16-17, 2001, New York, NY.
http://www.weisner.com/training/dreamweaver_help.htm or 800-646-9989.

Take XML and Tech Writing courses online! Our instructor-led courses
(4-6 hrs/wk) give you "hands on" experience at your convenience. STC members
get 20% off! http://www.online-learning.com/index.html.
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Re: Wood eye? Wood eye? Tin ear! Tin ear!
Next by Author: RE: Pseudowriters (Should 'Pseudo-issue')
Previous by Thread: Re: Pseudowriters
Next by Thread: Re: Pseudowriters


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads