TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: dreamweaver or frontpage? From:"L'illette Vasquez" <lillette9 -at- home -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Mon, 1 Jan 2001 22:34:12 -0600
I agree completely... which is why I phrased it "sometimes considered" ;)
I have, in the corporate arena, encountered many Frontpage advocates;
however, I do not know whether they had "worked their entire career in
Word." I rather suspect the majority of them took up Frontpage simply
because it is a Microsoft product or at the recommendation of someone who
never ventured further than that first foray into Web design using
Frontpage. For myself, although initially learning quite a few years ago to
develop with Frontpage, the arrival of Dreamweaver was definitely an
improvement - and a relief! It also coincided with my own increasing skills
and interests in more "sophisticated" site development. As regards teaching
Frontpage and Dreamweaver, I did in fact teach the latter at a local
community college, and had no trouble introducing it to both Beginning and
From: Itowsley -at- aol -dot- com [mailto:Itowsley -at- aol -dot- com]
Sent: Monday, January 01, 2001 8:40 PM
To: lillette9 -at- home -dot- com; techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Subject: Re: dreamweaver or frontpage?
In a message dated 12/29/00 3:57:27 PM Eastern Standard Time,
lillette9 -at- home -dot- com writes:
<< Dreamweaver is sometimes considered more difficult to use >>
I have only found this to be true of individuals who have worked their
career in Word. FrontPage2K is much more difficult to teach and learn than
DW - IMNSHO. I can get someone up and running with DW faster than FP2K
simply because you don't have to rely on any specific kind of server for
Though FP2K is better, it is still very closely wedded to NT/Win2K Servers.
Sponsored by an
anonymous satisfied subscriber since 1994.
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.