RE: It's a new millennium. Will companies ever learn?

Subject: RE: It's a new millennium. Will companies ever learn?
From: "Gilger.John" <JGilger -at- acresgaming -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 11:40:43 -0800

Well said!

John Gilger
Technical Writer
Acres Gaming, Inc.
702.914.5585

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Plato [mailto:intrepid_es -at- yahoo -dot- com]

A skilled, experienced contractor could do this in 3 weeks. It would be a
busy
3 weeks, but it is possible. Without knowing the details of the project you
can't assume this can't be done in 3 weeks.

> Even in this allegedly enlightened age, technical
> communicators still are not part of the development process, but rather
> brought in at the end, when the product is nearly complete.

There are good reasons to sometimes leave writers out until the end. 1)
Save
money, 2) Save time. What will the writer do while they are developing the
project? You can't write docs to something that doesn't exist. Sure it is
nice
to be around during those phases to watch the process, but most writers just
jerk around doing wasteful one-off work waiting for the developers to finish
the product.

The conventional wisdom that all writers must be standing around from the
moment a project begins just don't hold all the time. When money is tight,
such
luxuries are abandoned. There is also no reason to have a writer wasting
time
and money on plans when such work can be done quickly at the end.

> A lot of these
> new companies are being run by people who used to be at previous
companies,
> in some cases, several companies. Aren't these people learning anything?
>
> And who is going to have time to find and schedule time to interview users
> in 3 weeks?

Many smaller companies simply do not think it is important to have technical
writers around from the beginning of a project. I believe this attitude
comes
from two sources:

1. Lack of money.
2. Experience with bad tech writers.

There is a LOT of bitterness out there toward tech writers. Many engineers,
CTOs, and upper managers think writers are a waste of money. And honestly, a
lot of writers ARE a waste of money because they don't write anything. They
sit
around fussing and obsessing over fonts and gerunds demanding processes
nobody
wants and procedures nobody will follow.

We just started working with a technology firm in Silicon Valley. The CTO
recently left a very large company. He made it clear to me from the get-go
that if any of the writers failed to write documents he would fire them on
the
spot. I am paraphrasing, but he told me numerous stories of writers he hired
who argued all day over fonts, build detailed plans they never followed,
complained again and again that they couldn't do their jobs. Basically, he
was
sick and tired of people calling themselves writers when they didn't want to
write anything.

> At what pooint does it sink in that maybe it's no longer a matter of us
not
> fully educating the powers that be as to the value we do bring during the
> whole process, but simply a matter of (a) simply stupid people still
running
> the shows not knowing what a fully staffed team needs, or (b) stupidly
> frugal people running the processes who aren't willing to fully staff
teams
> from the start?

I think this is a simple issue of value-add. Many writers fail to
consistently
prove their value to the team. They fail to show how they can directly help
the process of producing products and technologies.

A lot of people still haven't learned that results speak much louder than
plans. Nobody cares if you have a great plan. The results are what matter.
If
you cannot produce results, your a waste. A good writer is resourceful and
can
produce quality results in a less than ideal situation.

However, most writers in less than ideal environments throw up their hands
and
bitch endlessly about how the world doesn't understand their needs. Boo hoo,
tell it to the unemployment office.

This attitude is summed up in the fact that many writers take months and
years
to write documents that could easily be done in days or weeks. If you cut
off
all the unnecessary planning and just sit down and jam out the docs, you can
get a lot done.

I don't think this is an issue of "when Will companies ever learn", I think
this is an issue of "when will the tech writers ever learn?"

Andrew Plato

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Develop HTML-based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver! (STC Discount.)
**NEW DATE/LOCATION!** January 16-17, 2001, New York, NY.
http://www.weisner.com/training/dreamweaver_help.htm or 800-646-9989.

Sponsored by DigiPub Solutions Corp, producers of PDF 2001
Conference East, June 4-5, Baltimore/Washington D.C. area.
http://www.pdfconference.com or toll-free 877/278-2131.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Re: Copyright date in docs
Next by Author: RE: right-click menu?
Previous by Thread: Re: It's a new millennium. Will companies ever learn?
Next by Thread: RE: It's a new millennium. Will companies ever learn?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads