Re: OT: (almost) Blank Pages

Subject: Re: OT: (almost) Blank Pages
From: edunn -at- transport -dot- bombardier -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 09:20:38 -0500

>>>Anybody have a justification for the "page left blank" convention any longer?

>>>(feeling ancient)

Perhaps because the clients involved still have documentation for 40 yrs ago?
This is certainly the case in the rail industry.
Once a convention is accepted, you can't change it. Or, you have to come up with
an enormous budget to change all previous documentation.

Eric L. Dunn

Develop HTML-Based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver 4 ($100 STC Discount)
**WEST COAST LOCATIONS** San Jose (Mar 1-2), San Francisco (Apr 16-17) or 800-646-9989.

Sponsored by DigiPub Solutions Corp, producers of PDF 2001
Conference East, June 4-5, Baltimore/Washington D.C. area. or toll-free 877/278-2131.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: FrameMaker's apprentice
Next by Author: RE: Textbook writing
Previous by Thread: RE: OT: (almost) Blank Pages
Next by Thread: RE: OT: (almost) Blank Pages

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads