RE: Is TW Still Hospitable to Novices (a Dilemma)

Subject: RE: Is TW Still Hospitable to Novices (a Dilemma)
From: "Nancy Osterhout" <bluetwilight -at- home -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 08:35:08 -0800

Peter Shea (USF) <pshea2 -at- lunca -dot- cas -dot- usf -dot- edu> wrote for advice
for a friend who has a liberal arts background, is computer
literate, has boned up on RoboHelp and Dreamweaver, written
real estate appraisals, and done Italian-to-English
translations.

<snip>

But whenever he applied for a job, the HR people would ask
if
he had "worked on a network" or spent at least two years
working for
another company.

<snip>

Inevitably, he grew discouraged and wondered if the
inspiring stories he
had heard about people falling sideways in the TW field from
other
professions were exaggerated, or whether the profession had
changed to
such a degree that only programmers or MIS graduates could
reasonably
expect tech writing work.

My friend is smart, hard-working, and discouraged.

What would any here say to such a person? </snip>



Peter, you can tell your friend that "technical writing" is,
simply put, communicating specialized information in a way
that they can understand and use it. Perhaps your friend
can level the playing field by emphasizing that definition
of "tech writing" in his interviews.

There are many niches in this field other than writing for
"high tech." For example, I write procedures to meet
requirements for ISO 9000 standard for ensuring product
quality. From there, I broke out into writing procedures
for CMM Level 2 that measures the maturity of the company's
software development process. I also help individuals and
groups design or re-design their own procedures to ensure
that their desired outcome every time they do it. I love
it!

Barbara Yanez has a great list of what's required of
"technical" communicators:

http://www.inkspot.com/genres/tech/techdefine.html.

There's also a great page of links about breaking into
technical writing:

http://www.inkspot.com/genres/tech/breakingin.html

For breaking the Catch 22 phenomenon:

http://www.synergistech.com/catch22.htm

Hope this helps!

P.S. Geoff Hart has a great article about providing the
correct level of detail in "It's Okay to Lie to Your Reader
(at least a little)."

http://www.inkspot.com/genres/tech/articles/accuracy.html





^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Develop HTML-Based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver 4 ($100 STC Discount)
**WEST COAST LOCATIONS** San Jose (Mar 1-2), San Francisco (Apr 16-17)
http://www.weisner.com/training/dreamweaver_help.htm or 800-646-9989.

Sponsored by DigiPub Solutions Corp, producers of PDF 2001
Conference East, June 4-5, Baltimore/Washington D.C. area.
http://www.pdfconference.com or toll-free 877/278-2131.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: RE: OT: Tech writers and cookbooks
Next by Author: RE: questions about training doc and ISD
Previous by Thread: RE: Miffed by BMP
Next by Thread: Organizational Skills


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads