RE: writing quality

Subject: RE: writing quality
From: KMcLauchlan -at- chrysalis-its -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 15:04:25 -0500

That's one of those academicalisms that appear to
have been made up out of nothing, but which take on
at least an aura of deja vue, once they've been explained.

I think I've already exhausted my posting limit for the
/d/a/y/ week, haven't I...?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sanjay Srikonda [mailto:sanjay -dot- srikonda -at- kiodex -dot- com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 2:33 PM
> Subject: RE: writing quality
> You know, a protocol analysis <he says, as though he knows
> what the hell is
> being talked about>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Swallow [mailto:bill_swallow -at- yahoo -dot- com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 2:00 PM
> Subject: Re: writing quality
> > What about a protocol analysis?
> A whosy-whatsit? ;)
> <snip>


Develop HTML-Based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver 4 ($100 STC Discount)
**New Dates!!** San Francisco (Apr 16-17), San Jose (Mar 29-30) or 800-646-9989.

IPCC 01, the IEEE International Professional Communication Conference,
October 24-27, 2001 at historic La Fonda in Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: Rounding figures?
Next by Author: RE: writing quality
Previous by Thread: RE: writing quality
Next by Thread: RE: writing quality

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads