FWD: RE: Whaddaya know? (long)

Subject: FWD: RE: Whaddaya know? (long)
From: "Dick Margulis" <margulis -at- mail -dot- fiam -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 11:14:36 -0400

[apologies if this is posted twice]

John Garison wrote:

>Great post! Any time I see "armamentarium" I know I'm gonna like it, though
>I might have opted for "quiver" myself ;-)

Depends if you're hunting 'possum or girding for battle, I guess.

>And .. I sympathize, and even understand your quandary. While I'm a decent
>writer, I don't think I could deconstruct a sentence and correctly label all
>its various types of clauses. Not that I never knew, just that I couldn't do
>it now. Maybe with a good grammar reference at hand.

Yeah, John, I know. You forget that I've edited your work <seg>

>
>But ... does an editor have to know what it's called? Or do they really just
>need to spot something amiss and be able to get the writer to then recognize
>and change it?

That's not a totally unreasonable position, but I see it as being both time-consuming and non-reproducible. If what I am aiming for is continuous improvement (in the sense that I want each of my clients to get better with time and reduce the editing burden as a result), then I want my editors to have the vocabulary--and be able to teach the vocabulary--to talk about the written language with those clients.

It isn't just about getting the prose right. It's also about getting the writer to write right.

>I guess what I'm getting at is that (god I'm starting to
>sound more like Andrew!) the results of their editing may count more than
>their ability to explicate what they do and how they do it. I re-read this
>and see myself arguing for intuitive editing, and hearing voices of long ago
>when I was "discussing" comments with my editor and asking "But WHY is that
>bad? It SOUNDS right to me!"
>
>Ah, the problem of seeing an argument from both sides ...
>
>

Oh, were you one of those pimply geeks in Debate Club, too?

Dick


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

*** Deva(tm) Tools for Dreamweaver and Deva(tm) Search ***
Build Contents, Indexes, and Search for Web Sites and Help Systems
Available 4/30/01 at http://www.devahelp.com or info -at- devahelp -dot- com

Sponsored by DigiPub Solutions Corp, producers of PDF 2001 Conference East,
June 4-6, Baltimore, MD. Now covering Acrobat 5. Early registration deadline
April 27. http://www.pdfconference.com.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Re: Whaddaya know? (long)
Next by Author: FWD: Re: Explaining your edits (was: Whaddaya know?)
Previous by Thread: Re: Whaddaya know? (long)
Next by Thread: Re: FWD: RE: Whaddaya know? (long)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads