Re: Nielsen's Rating

Subject: Re: Nielsen's Rating
From: Rick Henkel <coloradoframer -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:08:00 -0700 (PDT)

Much as I love PDFs, I have to agree with this
statement. Most of my own department's writers were
still using 3.0 when I got here. They didn't know 4.05
existed, not to mention 5.0.


--- Andrew Plato <intrepid_es -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:

> Also - he is very right about another aspect. Very
> few users are savvy
> enough to keep up to par with the latest versions of
> the Acrobat reader.
> We still do docs in 3.0 format because 75% of the
> readers don't have 4.0
> or 5.0 reader.

Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail


*** Deva(tm) Tools for Dreamweaver and Deva(tm) Search ***
Build Contents, Indexes, and Search for Web Sites and Help Systems
Available now at or info -at- devahelp -dot- com

Sponsored by Cub Lea, specialist in low-cost outsourced development
and documentation. Overload and time-sensitive jobs at exceptional
rates. Unique free gifts for all visitors to

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Re: Nielsen's Rating: From: Andrew Plato

Previous by Author: TOOL needed
Next by Author: Re: Nielsen's Rating
Previous by Thread: Re: Nielsen's Rating
Next by Thread: RE: Nielsen's Rating

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads