RE: Supremes rule for freelancers

Subject: RE: Supremes rule for freelancers
From: bryan -dot- westbrook -at- amd -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:46:10 -0500

Actually, the article on CNN.com indicates that most contracts in the past
10 years have already covered the issue. They claim that the greatest
effect will be on older articles.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kathy E. Gill [mailto:techwriter -at- cyberwriter -dot- com]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 12:21 PM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: RE: Supremes rule for freelancers

Second, I believe this means that future contracts with freelancers
-- photographers included -- will be more specific as to which rights
are being purchased or leased.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

*** Deva(tm) Tools for Dreamweaver and Deva(tm) Search ***
Build Contents, Indexes, and Search for Web Sites and Help Systems
Available now at http://www.devahelp.com or info -at- devahelp -dot- com

Sponsored by Cub Lea, specialist in low-cost outsourced development
and documentation. Overload and time-sensitive jobs at exceptional
rates. Unique free gifts for all visitors to http://www.cublea.com

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: RE: Supremes rule for freelancers
Next by Author: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
Previous by Thread: RE: Supremes rule for freelancers
Next by Thread: RE: Supremes rule for freelancers


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads