Documentation review process and tools? (in Frame)

Subject: Documentation review process and tools? (in Frame)
From: "Hart, Geoff" <Geoff-H -at- MTL -dot- FERIC -dot- CA>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 08:55:48 -0400

Cedric Simard's company uses FrameMaker to create documentation, and <<...
nearly 20 people have to review different parts of each piece of
documentation before sending to customers. How would you proceed?>>

Keith Soltys recently wrote about a plug-in for tracking changes directly in
Frame (www.soltys.ca/techcomm/software_reviews/Track_Changes_plugin.htm)
that might prove helpful if everyone else is working in Frame too. If not,
it might be worthwhile creating your initial drafts in Word (I'm assuming
that's what they reviewers are using, since you mentioned trying to export
from Frame to Microsoft RTF) and using Word's revision tracking tools. Once
you've got near-final approval of the drafts, you can then pour the text
into Frame for layout. This workflow (edit in word processor before going to
layout) is arguably less efficient than the more modern practice of working
from beginning to end in the desktop publishing (DTP) software, but is
nonetheless a proven approach that works very well indeed, and particularly
so if the reviewers don't use the DTP. On-paper reviews are another, even
less-efficient approach, but it works just fine, and many reviewers will
actually do a better job working on paper than working online. (Spoken as a
veteran of the "how could a reviewer miss such a gross error?" school of
hard knocks.)

A more relevant approach if the reviews are primarily technical and
"political" rather than actual copyedits (i.e., you expect relatively minor
changes) might be to use Acrobat to produce and distribute a PDF file.
"Acrobat Business Tools" provides a relatively low-cost solution; if you
equip every reviewer with a copy, they can then annotate the PDF files
extensively without ever altering your original information, which is still
safe in Frame. Given some of the errors I've seen introduced in peer review,
and the ease of catching such errors when the reviewers can't muck with the
original file behind your back, an approach based on the PDF files has much
to recommend it.

--Geoff Hart, FERIC, Pointe-Claire, Quebec
geoff-h -at- mtl -dot- feric -dot- ca
"User's advocate" online monthly at
www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/usersadvocate.html

"In seeking wisdom, the first step is silence, the second listening, the
third remembering, the fourth practicing, the fifth -- teaching
others."--Ibn Gabirol, poet and philosopher (c. 1022-1058)

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

*** Deva(tm) Tools for Dreamweaver and Deva(tm) Search ***
Build Contents, Indexes, and Search for Web Sites and Help Systems
Available now at http://www.devahelp.com or info -at- devahelp -dot- com

A landmark hotel, one of America's most beautiful cities, and
three and a half days of immersion in the state of the art:
IPCC 01, Oct. 24-27 in Santa Fe. http://ieeepcs.org/2001/

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Copyright as protection against liability?
Next by Author: Issues with Adobe Acrobat and PDFs?
Previous by Thread: Flowcharting---symbol/line meaning
Next by Thread: Re: Acronyms on the list (answer to perplexing riddle)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads