Re: Diverse Tools (was HTML editors)

Subject: Re: Diverse Tools (was HTML editors)
From: Dick Margulis <margulis -at- fiam -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 21:20:48 -0400

Earl Cooley III wrote:

> Speaking of compatibility issues down the road, the use of an
> exquisitely efficient tool with which none of the permanent staff
> is familiar presents problems to the employer: if the project
> involves a living document, does the employer want to be chained
> to the contractor for future updates, or suffer the extra expense
> of training current staff in the use of the magic tool? From the
> contractor's point of view, does she want to be yanked back to
> this employer at random, inconvenient intervals (which many conflict
> with scheduling of current contracts) to tweak the document?


That was implied in my conditional clause, was it not?



A landmark hotel, one of America's most beautiful cities, and
three and a half days of immersion in the state of the art:
IPCC 01, Oct. 24-27 in Santa Fe.

+++ Miramo -- Database/XML publishing automation. See us at +++
+++ Seybold SFO, Sept. 25-27, in the Adobe Partners Pavilion +++
+++ More info: +++

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


RE: Diverse Tools (was HTML editors): From: Earl Cooley III

Previous by Author: RE: Diverse Tools (was HTML editors)
Next by Author: "And yet you incessantly stand on your head ..."
Previous by Thread: RE: Diverse Tools (was HTML editors)
Next by Thread: RE: Diverse Tools (was HTML editors)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads