Re: WTC implications low for TWs

Subject: Re: WTC implications low for TWs
From: "Dan Roberts" <droberts63 -at- earthlink -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:21:15 -0400

yeah, I agree. I'm a perfectly fine NYCer, and "unaffected" by the events. My
corner 'cig store' is run by ME guys--all just 'regular' guys and treat me like
a favotie customer--and I could never imagine they'd have *anything*at*all* to
do with *anyI of this.....

but yesterday, I really really did want to hate them, and i knew gut level
that'd be really really wrong for me to do.

----- Original Message -----
From: "CC" <texchanchan -at- yahoo -dot- com>
> Lots of people of Middle Eastern extraction work in
> high-tech. They may have trouble from prejudiced,
> vengeful idiots. Those of us from other backgrounds
> may need to stand up for our perfectly innocent
> co-workers who may happen to share an ethnic
> background with suspected terrorists.


A landmark hotel, one of America's most beautiful cities, and
three and a half days of immersion in the state of the art:
IPCC 01, Oct. 24-27 in Santa Fe.

+++ Miramo -- Database/XML publishing automation. See us at +++
+++ Seybold SFO, Sept. 25-27, in the Adobe Partners Pavilion +++
+++ More info: +++

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

WTC implications low for TWs: From: CC

Previous by Author: RE: Typos of the week!
Next by Author: Thank you, Eric
Previous by Thread: Thank you, Eric
Next by Thread: Re: WTC implications low for TWs

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads