TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
>>>"Hart, Geoff" <Geoff-H -at- MTL -dot- FERIC -dot- CA> wrote in message
news:<121664 -at- techwr-l>...
(As Geoff desperately tries to drag this thread back on-topic ...)
Interesting that amidst this thread, nobody's observed how good a technical
writer Nostradamus was. Lacking clear or definitive product specifications
(for the future), or access to the designer (okay... the Designer, with
A contra view that was posted on the Technical Writers of India (TWIN)
sent by Edwin Skau...
10 reasons for us to believe that Nostradamus was not a technical writer.
1) He did not bother with an audience profile
2) The purpose and scope of his work was not clearly defined
3) He did not provide a table of terms and conventions
4) He did not provide a glossary
5) References are not identified and listed
6) He did not use figures or tables
7) He did not use numbered or bulleted lists
8) The information he delivered was cloaked in esoteric quatrains
9) He did not index his work
10) Last but not the least, the information has had nil utility value. ALL
of his "prophesies" have been interpreted in retrospect.
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.