RE: Typos of the week!--confession

Subject: RE: Typos of the week!--confession
From: Ellen Vanrenen <ellen -dot- vanrenen -at- clear-technology -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 14:40:47 -0600

Actually, that construction "my recently demised job" makes perfect sense to
me, except that I probably would have written:
"She also worked as a recruiter; in fact, she had set up my recently-demised
job." wouldof ruined the whole darned thing.
All kidding aside, I do think questions of usage are on-topic here at all
times. Helps me to be more conscious of what I write.
"probably would have written": It has just occurred to me that if there is
no conditional tense, I'm in the wrong language. I probably would write? No,
I'm sure that I am implying a condition. I think.
Now, would is the auxiliary verb...
Okay, I'm looking it up myself. Following my responsibilities.



Planning to attend IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe? Sign up by
October 3 and get a substantial discount! Program information,
online registration, and more on

+++ Miramo -- Database/XML publishing automation. See us at +++
+++ Seybold SFO, Sept. 25-27, in the Adobe Partners Pavilion +++
+++ More info: +++

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: the "word" dealing, not to mention cope
Next by Author: Returning to normal? - TECHWR-L
Previous by Thread: RE: Re[x+1]: Fuzzy images - Vent
Next by Thread: PDFs/PDFing/Techwriting was: Re[x+1]: Fuzzy images - Vent

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads