RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question

Subject: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
From: "Jane Carnall" <jane -dot- carnall -at- digitalbridges -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 16:47:55 +0100

Dan Hall offered: >>My opinion only...
>>Technical writers, with regard to grammatical issues:
>>* Should, in favor of confusing the reader, avoid standard usage in all
>>cases.

I think:
Any technical writer who has to resort to ungrammatical nonstandard usages
to confuse the reader is clearly not trying hard enough.

Jane Carnall
"Do, or go to. There is no try," said Yoda, refusing Luke's best java.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Announcing new options for IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe.
Attend the entire event, select a single day, or sign up for
a Saturday postconference workshop. http://ieeepcs.org/2001

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


References:
RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question: From: Dan Hall

Previous by Author: RE: German dates?
Next by Author: RE: Multilingualism and Technical Writers
Previous by Thread: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
Next by Thread: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads