How Long Before Common Usage Becomes the Rule? (was: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question

Subject: How Long Before Common Usage Becomes the Rule? (was: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
From: "Lin Sims" <linda -dot- sims -at- verizon -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 11:32:34 -0400

This question is more tongue-in-cheek than anything else, but I'm
genuinely curious about it.

English-speaking (and writing) people have been happily using
"they" as the indefinite singular pronoun since at least the time of
Shakespeare (400+ years now!). How long does a "common
usage" have to be used before it becomes grammatically correct?

The same question could also apply to splitting infinitives and
ending sentences with prepositions, both of which were
grammatical constructions for hundreds of years until those
Latinate prescriptivists got their hands on the grammar books.
Then all of a sudden they weren't all right anymore (amazing how
fast THAT change took), and now they're once more being
accepted, if grudgingly, by the newest generation of prescriptivists.
There are probably dozens of other examples waiting to be cited.

This doesn't mean I'm not a prescriptivist myself: I wince when I
hear "irregardless" or "as per", I've been known to tell people that
"only teeth impact", and the use of business speak such as
"prioritize" or "reimagining" has been known to drive me into
gibbering fits.

Twenty or so years from now, I expect I'll be the one complaining
about usages I consider to be ungrammatical even though by then
they'll be common--and maybe even correct.

On 9 Oct 2001, at 10:42, Brierley, Sean wrote:

For example, using "he" as a pronoun for
> things or persons of unknown gender might be correct usage but might
> also trip up and offend others. Workarounds include the he/she combo
> and grammatically incorrect use of the plural, they (which I use).
> Similarly, his becomes his/hers or theirs.
Lin Sims

Knowledge is Power.
Power Corrupts.
Study Hard. Be Evil.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Announcing new options for IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe.
Attend the entire event, select a single day, or sign up for
a Saturday postconference workshop. http://ieeepcs.org/2001

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

References:
RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question: From: Brierley, Sean

Previous by Author: Re: Tree view terminology
Next by Author: Thin Space?
Previous by Thread: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
Next by Thread: Re: How Long Before Common Usage Becomes the Rule? (was: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads