Re: Terminology question: Deprecated function

Subject: Re: Terminology question: Deprecated function
From: "Mark Moloney" <mmoloney -at- network365 -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 17:37:02 +0100

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stern, Geoff" <GStern -at- NetSilicon -dot- com>
> Our software engineers have been using the term
> "deprecated function" to mean a function that has been
> (and still is) fully supported but will not be supported in
> some future version (usually the next one or so).
>
> None of us -- engineers or writers -- likes this term,
> although it seems to be widespread usage in API
> documentation.

I don't mind "deprecated" myself, because I like the way it sounds so
disapproving. Also, as you said, it's widespread in API documentation (and
any programming documentation) and therefore should be understood (or at
least recognised) by your audience (I'm making assumptions; forgive me).
But, I will suggest:

1. Doomed
2. Lapsing (or elapsing)
3. Senile
4. Expiring
5. Outmoded

And, although I like no.1, I can't see myself using any of them.


/ Mark Moloney
Somewhere in Ireland (but not for much longer)



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Announcing new options for IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe.
Attend the entire event, select a single day, or sign up for
a Saturday postconference workshop. http://ieeepcs.org/2001

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

References:
Terminology question: Deprecated function: From: Stern, Geoff

Previous by Author: Re: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
Next by Author: Re: Simple symbol question
Previous by Thread: RE: Terminology question: Deprecated function
Next by Thread: RE: Terminology question: Deprecated function


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads