RE: FrameMaker 6.1 to 5.5

Subject: RE: FrameMaker 6.1 to 5.5
From: Iggy <iggy_1996dp -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 06:44:56 -0700 (PDT)

> Instead, pick one FrameMaker version for the project
> and stick to it.
> FrameMaker 5.5.6 was a solid version, use it. Or,
> FrameMaker 6 is solid,
> too, stick with that. And, consider that the upgrade
> from FrameMaker 5.x to
> 6.0 is only $225ish, that's the equivalent of, what,
> four or five hours of
> labor by the contractor . . . somebody buy the
> upgrade.

Sean is right on as usual. The long-term
cost-effectiveness of buying the upgrade definitely
makes more sense than going through a MIF exchange.

Another perspective:

The contractor might appreciate those added hours in
his/her bank account (and then could easily afford the
upgrade later).

But, what's the point here? To help the consultant
make more money, or to save money and get the job done
in the least amount of time?

Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.

Announcing new options for IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe,
New Mexico: attend the entire event or select a single day.
For details and online registration, visit

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: FrameMaker 6.1 to 5.5: From: Brierley, Sean

Previous by Author: Re: Adobe PhotoShop 6.0
Next by Author: Re: RoboHELP Help
Previous by Thread: RE: FrameMaker 6.1 to 5.5
Next by Thread: RE: FrameMaker 6.1 to 5.5

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads