[techwr-l] RE: Terminology question: Deprecated function

Subject: [techwr-l] RE: Terminology question: Deprecated function
From: "Stern, Geoff" <GStern -at- NetSilicon -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 10:50:51 -0400

Please accept a lurker's thanks to everyone who replied, on list and off
list, to my question about "deprecated."

Initially, I was averse to using it, but as I read folks' comments and
thought back to how I'd seen the term used elsewhere, I came to like it.
Sort of like certain pungent cheeses or single-malt whiskeys.

I especially liked some of the propsed alternatives -- doomed, senile,
lame duck, and so on.

You guys are pretty good when you're not trying to rile up Eric <smirk>.

Geoff Stern
NetSilicon, Inc.
"Complete Embedded Networking Now"
mailto:GStern -at- NetSilicon -dot- com 800 243-2333 or 781 647-1234 ext 4540

Announcing new options for IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe,
New Mexico: attend the entire event or select a single day.
For details and online registration, visit http://ieeepcs.org/2001

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Terminology question: Deprecated function
Next by Author: RE: Bonus instead of raise -- why?
Previous by Thread: Word XP
Next by Thread: HUMO(U)R: Lone tech writer haiku

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads