RE: Jargon Lovin' Fool

Subject: RE: Jargon Lovin' Fool
From: "Douglas S. Bailey (AL)" <dbailey -at- commandalkon -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 10:50:24 -0500

> It's been my experience that readers - of assorted
> sophistication levels - are
> smart and do NOT revert to idiocy where they can. What they
> usually are is
> incredibly busy doing whatever they're getting paid to do,
> and learning a new
> piece of software is NOT what they're getting paid to do. So
> they usually
> resent the learning process as a waste of their time, unless

Exactly. They just want to use achieve their goal, they don't want to have
to learn a new way of doing things. They don't want to have to _think_,
period. They'd prefer to reserve thinking for more important things. Not
wanting to think about learning doesn't mean they're idiots.


Announcing new options for IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe,
New Mexico: attend the entire event or select a single day.
For details and online registration, visit

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Re: Jargon Lovin' Fool: From: Elna Tymes

Previous by Author: RE: Simple symbol question
Next by Author: RE: Word 2000 to .pdf
Previous by Thread: Re: Jargon Lovin' Fool
Next by Thread: Re: Jargon Lovin' Fool

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads