RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question

Subject: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
From: KMcLauchlan -at- chrysalis-its -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 16:44:50 -0400

It's one of those, "If I don't look at it, I don't
have to acknowledge it" situations. :-)

Only when I do look closely, will I know for sure
how much my draft diverges from the then-current

That probably won't happen until we're big enough
to warrant a little helper for Kevin, at which time
we may very well have re-instituted much of the structure
that we've dropped in our current down-size. So the
already-written stuff would fit, once again.

At least, that's what I'll keep telling myself until I
have to face the awful truth.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brierley, Sean [mailto:Sean -dot- Brierley -at- Jenzabar -dot- Net]
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 11:56 AM
> Subject: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
> Then, would not your answe be "Not at all" or "Not well'? Mine was.

Announcing new options for IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe,
New Mexico: attend the entire event or select a single day.
For details and online registration, visit

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: Simple symbol question
Next by Author: RE: Tech-Reading vs. Other Reading
Previous by Thread: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
Next by Thread: New TECHWR-L Poll Question

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads