RE: Layoffs-puzzling question

Subject: RE: Layoffs-puzzling question
From: "Dugas, Andrew" <ADugas -at- eTranslate -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 09:01:58 -0700

I was laid off recently. When I came back on a later day to get some stuff,
I found I needed to be escorted through the hallways where I once roamed

But I didn't take it personally. It was just policy to avoid the rare act of
vengeance. The person escorting me trusted me completely, but had to follow
the policy. She felt as uncomfortable with it as I did, but we both chuckled
about it.

The point of having such a policy is prevention, not cruelty, and as policy
it ensures that all exiting employees receive equal treatment. For example,
if one well-liked person retained free reign while another, less popular
coworker was escorted physically from the building... Well, that would seem
pretty personal and unfair. (Maybe even actionable. Any workplace lawyers
out there tuning in?)

Policy is impersonal, whether it's flushing the toilet when you're done or
being escorted in the building.

Criticize it, point out its absurdities, whatever. But wouldn't take it


-----Original Message-----
From: Erika Yanovich [mailto:ERIKA_y -at- Rad -dot- co -dot- il]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:01 AM
Subject: Layoffs-puzzling question

I've been reading all these postings about layoffs and I am amazed about the
cruelty of some employers. I believe here in Israel we have less cruel
stories, although lately some layoffs resemble the US ones. The puzzling
question is how come employers who trusted their employees for x number of
years relate to them suddenly as potential troublemakers and not allow them
to access their computers anymore or even say goodbye to their collegues. I
understand that some people could delete files or do other damages, but I
think these cases are so rare that they really do not warrant treating
everyone badly. Am I right?

We recently went through a layoff and I was on the management side. We tried
to make it as humane as possible (although that is never enough). These
people feel bad enough as it is so why also treat them badly?


Announcing new options for IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe,
New Mexico: attend the entire event or select a single day.
For details and online registration, visit

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: Most Impt. Skill to Learn in Tech Comm Program?
Next by Author: RE: "They don't need no stinkin' documentation..."
Previous by Thread: RE: Layoffs-puzzling question
Next by Thread: RE: Layoffs-puzzling question

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads