RE: Secretary Proofing Manuals?

Subject: RE: Secretary Proofing Manuals?
From: TDean -at- envirosys -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 16:42:44 -0400


John wrote :Who cares what title is given to a good proof-reader?

I suppose I am being egotistical... I don't agree with her giving final
approval. It is one thing to have a good proof-reader of which she is, but
it does frustrate me to have to get her approval.

Thank you all for your comments and thoughts!!
Tina Dean

=^.^=
*



"Gilger.John"
<JGilger -at- acresg To: <TDean -at- envirosys -dot- com>, "TECHWR-L"
aming.com> <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
cc:
10/24/2001 Subject: RE: Secretary Proofing Manuals?
04:33 PM






I think you've got your nose out of joint for no reason.

Who cares what title is given to a good proof-reader? It sounds like
your "uppers" have the right idea when they want someone who is
independent of the doc production process doing the final proof read.

I would rather have our department's executive assistant catch one of my
bloopers than hear about it from one of our customers.

John Gilger
Senior Technical Writer
Acres Gaming, Inc.


-----Original Message-----
From: TDean -at- envirosys -dot- com [mailto:TDean -at- envirosys -dot- com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 01:00 PM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: Secretary Proofing Manuals?


Whirlers,

I checked the Archives, but I didn't find much on the subject directly.

Currently, our company is re-structuring. The technical writers from
the
different groups in our company go together and agreed on review
procedure/document process for all of us to follow as a technical
writing
group. This has never happen before - in our company, the Windows tech
writers did one thing, and the Unix tech writers did another.

I am very upset and insulted because the "uppers" insist on the
executive
assistant proofing all of our manuals before they go out to our
customers.
In fact, we have to start including her in our style meetings as well.
Am I
just being egotistical? Does anyone else have a similar scenario?

The executive assistant doesn't have any control over the software so
why
should she have any control over the manuals? They are products just as
well.

Disgruntled,
Tina Dean






^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Announcing new options for IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe,
New Mexico: attend the entire event or select a single day.
For details and online registration, visit http://ieeepcs.org/2001

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: Re: Secretary Proofing Manuals?
Next by Author: Re: Secretary Proofing Manuals?
Previous by Thread: Re: Secretary Proofing Manuals?
Next by Thread: RE: Secretary Proofing Manuals?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads