Reviewer of Doom (was: RE: Secretary Proofing Manuals?)

Subject: Reviewer of Doom (was: RE: Secretary Proofing Manuals?)
From: aschiff -at- factset -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 09:42:20 -0400


Just responding to some sentiments expressed on this fascinating thread.
Many have remarked that writers should feel lucky to have another pair of
eyes reviewing their documents.

I'll agree that another set of eyes is a good thing. However, I've had some
experiences with reviewers that make me want to take them off my reviewer
list permanently. Usually these reviewers have good intentions, but they
end up being THE REVIEWER OF DOOM.

Top 5 Signs You're Working with the Reviewer of Doom:
===================================================
5. The Bottleneck (review deadlines mysteriously do not apply to them
because they are monstrously overworked and their time is important. They
become infuriated if you proceed without their approval.)

4. They vehemently disagree with every silly style decision you've ever had
to make about the document set (which fonts to use, whether you click a
button or press a button, 'advisor' vs. 'adviser,' etc.)

3. This, that, and the other is wrong/unclear in the document, but they
won't have the correct information for you until [pick one: next month,
next quarter, next leap-year]. In the meantime, it is emphatically NOT okay
to remove the section entirely.

2. Upon final review of a document that's been under development for 11
months and is about to ship to the printer, they observe that it'd "look
better" in Landscape orientation and all sub-headings should be phrased as
questions.

1. The eight dreaded words: "Let's schedule a meeting to talk about
this...."


Abby Schiff
FactSet Research Systems
203.863.1593


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Announcing new options for IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe,
New Mexico: attend the entire event or select a single day.
For details and online registration, visit http://ieeepcs.org/2001

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: Documentation as a cost center
Next by Author: RE: Display or appear (Was: Can "either" be used if there are thr ee or moreselections?)
Previous by Thread: RE: Word misbehaving
Next by Thread: Re: Reviewer of Doom (was: RE: Secretary Proofing Manuals?)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads