RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question

Subject: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
From: Doug Grossman <Doug -dot- Grossman -at- sas -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 12:50:26 -0500

I didn't answer "other," but almost did. My reason: I have been laid off once, but it was questionable as to whether it was as a technical writer or not (which is specifically part of the question). I was more of a proofreader at the time---technical writing-related yes, but actual technical writing? Dunno.

-----Original Message-----
From: Iggy [mailto:iggy_1996dp -at- yahoo -dot- com]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 12:44 PM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: Re: New TECHWR-L Poll Question


So far scored 2 votes... Seeing as there was a "not
been laid off [implied "yet"]" option, and an "8 or
more times" option, what could "other" possibly mean
ot score 2 votes...???

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Announcing new options for IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe,
New Mexico: attend the entire event or select a single day.
For details and online registration, visit http://ieeepcs.org/2001

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Re: An observation about the writer-engineer relationship
Next by Author: Re: Section 508
Previous by Thread: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
Next by Thread: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads