RE: "They don't need no stinkin' documentation..."

Subject: RE: "They don't need no stinkin' documentation..."
From: david -dot- locke -at- amd -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 11:35:35 -0600

> If it looks like marketing fluff, it is an expression of some graphic artist's ego
> needs. That is not good design. Good design is design that suits its purpose. If the
> purpose is to be read, the design should support that. "Looked too good"? No. Looked
> too pretty, maybe.

Absolutely. If you look at a table and see what you need to see immediately, you won't even think about how many hours it took to make that happen. You won't know that the SME created four tables with different relationships, that the source tables couldn't just be dropped in and lined up into that one table. All you will know is that you didn't have to kill yourself to get the answer. It was right there. That's design. That's content.

David Locke

Announcing new options for IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe,
New Mexico: attend the entire event or select a single day.
For details and online registration, visit

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: "They don't need no stinkin' documentation..."
Next by Author: Need New Concepts to Discuss (Was RE: Need help please)
Previous by Thread: Re: "They don't need no stinkin' documentation..."
Next by Thread: RE: "They don't need no stinkin' documentation..."

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads