RE: "They don't need no stinkin' documentation..."

Subject: RE: "They don't need no stinkin' documentation..."
From: "Douglas S. Bailey (AL)" <dbailey -at- commandalkon -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 11:55:19 -0600

> Contrariwise, you can understand your topic forward,
> backwards, and sideways, and as seen through the fifth
> dimension, but if people can't or won't use the content
> effectively, they might as well not have it. That's why
> content and design have equal importance to me: they both
> have to be good if the information is going to be delivered.

Good point. It's important to have a strong military, but if we can't
deliver our "big hammer" to the target than it's not very dangerous, eh?
Content, like military might, is only as valuable as the design/delivery
system, and vice versa.


Announcing new options for IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe,
New Mexico: attend the entire event or select a single day.
For details and online registration, visit

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Re: "They don't need no stinkin' documentation...": From: Bruce Byfield

Previous by Author: RE: Word 2000 to .pdf
Next by Author: Subordinated bookmarks in PDF using Frame
Previous by Thread: Re: "They don't need no stinkin' documentation..."
Next by Thread: Re: "They don't need no stinkin' documentation..."

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads