Re: XML & the future of tech writing - 2 thoughts

Subject: Re: XML & the future of tech writing - 2 thoughts
From: Iggy <iggy_1996dp -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 09:38:15 -0800 (PST)

What you see in ads are more of a wish list than a

--- Erika Yanovich <ERIKA_y -at- Rad -dot- co -dot- il> wrote:
> If we agree that knowing the tools is less important
> that understanding the
> product + knowing how to write, then we should
> convince employers that
> knowledge of a specific tool is not an important
> hiring criteria, but a
> secondary one. I still see a lot of ads mentioning
> tools as MUST
> requirements. I know sometimes there is not enough
> time to train people, but
> that should be only SOMETIMES not ALWAYS.

Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.

Announcing new options for IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe,
New Mexico: attend the entire event or select a single day.
For details and online registration, visit

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

XML & the future of tech writing - 2 thoughts: From: Erika Yanovich

Previous by Author: Re: Need New Concepts to Discuss (Was RE: Need help please)
Next by Author: Re: Technical Writing Union
Previous by Thread: XML & the future of tech writing - 2 thoughts
Next by Thread: RE: XML & the future of tech writing - 2 thoughts

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads