Re: More Unions

Subject: Re: More Unions
From: "Steve Arrants" <stephena -at- compbear -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 14:00:23 -0800

From: <jcredland -at- avaya -dot- com> wrote:
> Because, as a rule, unions will defend all members for "wrongful"
> claims without first checking to see whether the dismissal qualifies as
> "wrongful".

Is there concrete evidence for this, or is this one of those "everybody
knows this is true" sort of things?

I don't mind reading opposing data--heck, it has sometimes made me look at
an issue and
change my mind (cf. Andrew Plato posts)--but if we're going to discuss
something as important
and as emotinally charged as "unionization", please, folks--let's try and
stick to facts.

steve arrants Certified Cruelty Free
"The dream was marvelous, but the terror was great.
We must treasure the dream, whatever the terror."

Be a published author! iUniverse gives you: a high-quality paperback, a
custom cover design, and distribution to 25,00 retailers. Join our almost
10,000 published authors today.

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


RE: More Unions: From: jcredland

Previous by Author: Ethics and drug tests
Next by Author: Re: Technical Writing Union
Previous by Thread: RE: More Unions
Next by Thread: Re: More Unions

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads