RE: Style guides - doc standards vs processes

Subject: RE: Style guides - doc standards vs processes
From: "Steve Hudson" <steve -at- wright -dot- com -dot- au>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 14:47:33 +1100

Bruce Byfield did scribe:


> So, I can't help wondering if I'd emphasize process more if I were trying
to coordinate a larger group of writers.

Ding!!!!! The lights go ON! Now - extend this concept to "if I worked for a
company of thousands of employees who need to write stuff..."



Steve Hudson , HDK List MVP
Wright Technologies Pty Ltd (Aus)


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Be a published author! iUniverse gives you: a high-quality paperback, a
custom cover design, and distribution to 25,00 retailers. Join our almost
10,000 published authors today. http://www.iuniverse.com/media/techwr

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
Re: Style guides - doc standards vs processes: From: Bruce Byfield

Previous by Author: RE: Style guides - doc standards vs processes
Next by Author: RE: (Slight) HUMOUR: Banned Words
Previous by Thread: Re: Style guides - doc standards vs processes
Next by Thread: RE: Style guides - doc standards vs processes


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads