RE: Ethics and Job-Hunting

Subject: RE: Ethics and Job-Hunting
From: bryan -dot- westbrook -at- amd -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:46:40 -0600

The only job I've had in the last 10 years that did not require a pee-pee test before starting was as a retail inventory auditor. Not surprisingly, that company was full of druggies, and when I was a team leader there I had to actually get one fired for it (well, actually for stealing Valium from a pharmacy we were counting and then driving a company van under the influence of 6 or 7 of them the next day).


-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Baresch [mailto:baresch -at- earthlink -dot- net]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 12:40 PM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: Re: Ethics and Job-Hunting

I do have another filter that I haven't seen mentioned: I'd have to be
desperate to take a job that requires a drug test for other than safety
reasons (e.g. operating heavy equipment). That aversion to unwarranted


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of
your book. What are you waiting for? http://www.iuniverse.com/media/techwr

Have you looked at the new content on TECHWR-L lately?
See http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ and check it out.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: RE: Ethics and Job-Hunting
Next by Author: RE: Ethics and Job-Hunting
Previous by Thread: RE: Ethics and Job-Hunting
Next by Thread: RE: Ethics and Job-Hunting


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads