RE: Peer edits

Subject: RE: Peer edits
From: "Stuart Rogers" <srogers -at- phoenix-geophysics -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 10:47:50 -0500

My company will be instituting a peer editing process in the coming

I've read about the benefits and challenges of peer editing, and I'm
to come up with an initial list of items we should be looking for in
other's documents.

Somewhat old, but still a good article:

Stuart Rogers
Technical Communicator
Phoenix Geophysics Limited

mailto:srogers -at- phoenix-geophysics -dot- com

Developers explain How the Product Works.
Technical Writers explain How to Work the Product.


Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of
your book. What are you waiting for?

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Re: "Providing content" vs "writing"
Next by Author: RE: Framemaker Files to Print Signatures
Previous by Thread: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
Next by Thread: RE: Looking for written procedure for doc > ps > pdf conversion.

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads