Re: ADMIN: RE: Network Security Article Clarification

Subject: Re: ADMIN: RE: Network Security Article Clarification
From: "Dana Worley" <dana -at- campbellsci -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 09:54:24 -0700

As someone who just sort of hangs on the edge of the list here, my
perception of the exchange was the same as Eric & Deb's. I saw
no humor in some of the responses to Andrew's post.

We all make mistakes. It takes someone with character to point
out those mistakes to others. Unfortunately, it seemed (at least
from my chair) that some people were revelling in the admission of
the mistake and just couldn't wait to twist the knife a little.

The next time I make a mistake, I hope I am cut a little slack. I am
sure you would all appreciate a little slack, too.

Dana W.


Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of
your book. What are you waiting for?

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Merry Christmas, all
Next by Author: Re: Quality of source material from Development
Previous by Thread: ADMIN: RE: Network Security Article Clarification
Next by Thread: What do you do when the doughnuts dough'nut work?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads