RE: Should vs. Will, Must and Can

Subject: RE: Should vs. Will, Must and Can
From: Marguerite Krupp <mkrupp -at- cisco -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:02:58 -0500

Leaping in late, I have to add that "must" leaves no doubt about what
actions are required. "Should" implies an option. When I was writing about
process control systems, we never used "should" because of the potential for
legal liability.

And I do favor the present tense, as do most of the other posters.

My $0.02
Marguerite

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Sponsored by eHelp Corporation, makers of RoboHelp - the industry standard
in Help authoring. Download a trial version today or get special savings when
you buy the RoboHelp 2002 Holiday Edition. Visit http://www.ehelp.com/techwr

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Windows XP (Was: Anyone Hide Easter Eggs in Docs?)
Next by Author: RE: Operator vs. User
Previous by Thread: RE: Should vs. Will, Must and Can
Next by Thread: RE: Should vs. Will, Must and Can


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads