RE: Repeated cautions: necessary or redundant?

Subject: RE: Repeated cautions: necessary or redundant?
From: Marguerite Krupp <mkrupp -at- cisco -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 10:09:08 -0500

Bryan wrote:
<snip>
Actually most automatic pressing equipment is operated by two buttons
(usually positioned 180 degrees apart) that require the operator to have
both hands on the controls. The prevents them from having their hands under
the press.</snip>

Yabbut, if the operator is supposed to holler "Clear" each time, it implies
that there may be other people in the vicinity who may not be aware of
what's about to happen. That's where it gets tricky.

Marguerite

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Attention ForeHelp and Doc-to-Help Users! Upgrade your existing product to
RoboHelp for only $299, through January 31st. RoboHelp can import your
existing Help projects! Learn how else RoboHelp can benefit you. www.ehelp.com/techwr

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: Repeated Cautions: necessary or redundant?
Next by Author: RE: A cautionary tale: Portfolio Assessment
Previous by Thread: RE: Repeated cautions: necessary or redundant?
Next by Thread: RE: Repeated cautions: necessary or redundant?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads