Re: Legality of web links to articles? (Take II)

Subject: Re: Legality of web links to articles? (Take II)
From: Kelley <kwalker2 -at- gte -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 14:46:45 -0500

At 01:16 PM 2/12/02 -0500, Hart, Geoff wrote:

<<The WEB was conceived primarily for commerce>>

No, it was designed primarily for easy exchange of information among
scientific researchers; it was only much later hijacked by commerce and
business, often to its detriment.

yep, I use the Web to refer to something that is largely about commerce. There was a debate as you probably remember: continue the direct and indirect government funding, or go with the advertising model. Those who had influence at the time said, go with the advertising model. They shaped the rise of the Web. Admittedly, I'm being influenced by hacker culture in my use of the term Web v. Internet. It's not just about port 80, IOW.

I enjoyed Joseph Turow's discussion in _Breaking Up America_. Some of his views are summarized here,

Like I said, politically I have one answer, but in other roles...


Did you know you can get RoboHelp certified?
To learn how, visit Be sure to also check out
our special pricing offers and promotions for RoboHelp 2002.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Legality of web links to articles? (Take II): From: Hart, Geoff

Previous by Author: Re: legality of web links to articles?
Next by Author: Re: History means "Before self" LONG (was RE: legality of web links t o articles?
Previous by Thread: RE: Legality of web links to articles? (Take II)
Next by Thread: Rejected! How strange is this e-mail filtering?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads