Dangling Modifiers

Subject: Dangling Modifiers
From: Ellen Kelly <EllenK -at- mentergy -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:21:30 -0500

What's the current thought on dangling modifers?

Every time our VP edits my docs (we are a small company, I take whatever
edits I can get!) he marks up dangling modifiers. My thought on the subject,
which we disucss every time, is that it makes for awkward sentence
constructions that do not mirror the way people talk. This in turn makes the
documentation hard to read, as you have to stop and think through the
sentence.

I usually end up going through and rewriting the sentences so that it is not
an issue. But I resent it, and feel that it is unnecessary.

This time, the documentation "that I have have added dangling modifers to"
will remain as is. Is this blasphemy?

-Ellen





^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Now's a great time to buy RoboHelp! You'll get SnagIt screen capture
software and a $200 onsite training voucher FREE when you buy RoboHelp
Office or RoboHelp Enterprise. Hurry, this offer expires February 28, 2002. www.ehelp.com/techwr

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: RE: SeriousQ2.0
Next by Author: RE: Dangling Modifiers
Previous by Thread: Re: Single sourcing tools
Next by Thread: Re: Dangling Modifiers


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads