RE: Editing soft vs. hard copy?

Subject: RE: Editing soft vs. hard copy?
From: "Steve Hudson" <cruddy -at- optushome -dot- com -dot- au>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 22:08:29 +1100

Terse agreement: Online until *final* copies. In practice this has meant
three prints IMHE. One to find a few last mistakes, fix and reprint. Then
niggle over a few more split hairs. Next is the one we nod sagely and say
"Mmmm, send it". Ideally, it'd per perfect from the online work. Nope, you
always need to change circumstance to stay fresh and that's hard to do

Steve Hudson, Word Heretic
Word help and tools: heretic -at- tdfa -dot- com

-----Original Message-----
From: Hart, Geoff

Doug Grossman "vehemently disagreed" with the assertion that "Practically no
one edits on-line reliably. If you want to edit reliably
and thoroughly, print it out."

This depends on what you and the original poster meant. There's broad
consensus among editors that many of us (perhaps most) miss some things
online that we'd miss onscreen, and vice versa.

Now's a great time to buy RoboHelp! You'll get SnagIt screen capture
software and a $200 onsite training voucher FREE when you buy RoboHelp
Office or RoboHelp Enterprise. Hurry, this offer expires February 28, 2002.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Editing soft vs. hard copy?: From: Hart, Geoff

Previous by Author: RE: Intellectual Property Registry!
Next by Author: RE: Editing soft vs. hard copy?
Previous by Thread: RE: Editing soft vs. hard copy?
Next by Thread: Re: ADMIN: Religious discussions aren't technical writing

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads