Re: Dangling Modifiers
I would have to say that writing as we speak isn't all that it is talked upIt's not a case of writing how we speak. No writer - not even the absurdist playwrights - writes exactly how we speak. The most that can be said is that some writers create an illusion of speech.
to be. In support of this premise, note the preposition without a
specifically referenced noun.
However, common usage doesn't just refer to speech. It includes how people write novels, plays, and newspapers, too. Or, to be exact (since a good deal of popular writing is poor writing), it refers to the best examples of common usage.
Although a document is a oneNo one ever said it did.
direction "conversation," common usage doesn't give us permission to write
And, conversely, claiming to follow the rules doesn't give us permission to write poorly, either. That's the whole point of the famous rebuttal to the preposition rule - usually attributed to Winston Churchill - "This is the sort of English up with which I will not put." The sentence is grammatically correct, but extremely awkward. Only somebody more obsessed with the rules than with writing clearly would seriously use such a construction.
That's really my point: writing well is not necessarily about following the rules. At times, it may be about breaking the rules. If you approach writing with too great a concern about the rules, then you're handicapping yourself. In many cases, you're distracting yourself from the real issues, such as clarity and communication, for a set of arbitrary rules that can distort your language as often as they enhance it.
Bruce Byfield 604.421.7177 bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com
"It's as bad as it gets
The Surgeon General said, 'you're better off with cigarettes,'
If you must have your bad habits, why don't you stick to booze:
Love's been linked to the blues."
-David Olney, "Love's Been Linked to the Blues"
Now's a great time to buy RoboHelp! You'll get SnagIt screen capture
software and a $200 onsite training voucher FREE when you buy RoboHelp
Office or RoboHelp Enterprise. Hurry, this offer expires February 28, 2002. www.ehelp.com/techwr
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
RE: Dangling Modifiers: From: greg . hamill
Previous by Author:
Re: He said...She said...He said...etc. (Was Re: What's A TW Got To DO To Get A Job Around Here?!)
Next by Author: Re: He said...She said...He said...etc. (Was Re: What's A TW Got To DO To Get A Job Around Here?!)
Previous by Thread: RE: Dangling Modifiers
Next by Thread: Single sourcing tools?
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine