RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question

Subject: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
From: "Dan Hall" <dhall -at- san-carlos -dot- rms -dot- slb -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 07:56:13 -0600

Well Keith, I would have checked 3, Can't be done,
but my situation is a little unusual, so I thought
I'd post a clarification.

You see, I think that it's actually a combination
of 1, 3 and 5, along with 7 - "Ask the magic 8-ball"



Dan Hall
Sr. Technical Writer
SchlumbergerSema RTEMS

-----Original Message-----
From: bounce-techwr-l-72045 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
[mailto:bounce-techwr-l-72045 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com]On Behalf Of
kcronin -at- daleen -dot- com
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:45 AM
Subject: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question

New poll suggestion:

What are the chances that a poll could be presented to List members in
such a way that none of them felt it necessary to post clarifying messages
to the List?

1 - No way in hell
2 - You're dreaming
3 - Can't be done
4 - No way Jose
5 - Fuggeddiboudit
6 - Same as Andrew Plato joining the STC

Now's a great time to buy RoboHelp! You'll get SnagIt screen capture
software and a $200 onsite training voucher FREE when you buy RoboHelp
Office or RoboHelp Enterprise. Hurry, this offer expires February 28, 2002.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: FWD: So called writers and intellectual property
Next by Author: RE: THANKS! Re: It's time to go (LONG)
Previous by Thread: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
Next by Thread: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads