What about "semi-official" internal docs?

Subject: What about "semi-official" internal docs?
From: "Dan Hall" <dhall -at- san-carlos -dot- rms -dot- slb -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 13:48:21 -0600

Anyone get to edit those?

I saw one last week the suggested we need to change
the "...manor in which we service customers." This
from the senior VP, no less. Work that spell-checker,
big guy!

I guess we're moving out of this industrial building
so we can service our customers in a two-story Tudor?


It kills me to see stuff like this going out with
errors when all it would take is 30 seconds to run
it past someone (anyone) with an eye for this type
of error.



Dan Hall
Sr. Technical Writer
SchlumbergerSema RTEMS

Check it out! Get some cool freebies when you buy RoboHelp! You'll receive
SnagIt screen capture software and a 10% discount voucher for RoboHelp
Consulting. This special offers expires March 29, 2002.

Have you looked at the new content on TECHWR-L lately?
See http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ and check it out.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Next weeks Techwr-l poll?
Next by Author: A long week
Previous by Thread: Re: ASAP: "Fillable" wars
Next by Thread: Re: What about "semi-official" internal docs?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads