RE: Seeking feedback on Picayune Footer nit

Subject: RE: Seeking feedback on Picayune Footer nit
From: "Wilcox, Rose (ZB5646)" <Rose -dot- Wilcox -at- pinnaclewest -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 13:58:55 -0700

John P wrote:
<<
When I get a document that give me ALL of the information I need, my
first thought is "WHAT A GREAT DOCUMENT!". When I get a document that
looks good, but is missing something that I need, it's a terrible
looking document.
>>

Regarding the path in the footer thing though, does it really need to be on
every page? These docs are passed through email as whole entities, so
rarely are they going to be separated from their front matter. In addition,
we have no guarantee that the latest writer knew enough to update the
automatic field, so the path name *could* still be incorrect.

Rosie


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
PC Magazine gives RoboHelp Office 2002 five stars - a perfect score!
"The ultimate developer's tool for designing help systems. A product
no professional help designer should be without." Check out RoboHelp at
http://www.ehelp.com/techwr

Check out the TECHWR-L Site redesign!
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Seeking feedback on Picayune Footer nit
Next by Author: RE: Seeking Feedback on Picayune Footer Nit
Previous by Thread: Re: Seeking feedback on Picayune Footer nit
Next by Thread: RE: Seeking feedback on Picayune Footer nit


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads