Re: Validating documentation

Subject: Re: Validating documentation
From: Michele Marques <msmarques -at- rogers -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 16:20:29 -0500


I started doing this, and what really appealed to the QA department is that I would give them my docs as soon as they were supposed to start testing. This helped them understand the system they were supposed to be QAing, and allowed them to both test the system against my docs and my docs against the system.

On the other hand, if I ask them to QA docs after they have finished QA'ing the system, they are not as enthusiastic and may have other priorities (testing other new developments, tracking fixes, etc.).

- Michele Marques
msmarques -at- rogers -dot- com
http://members.rogers.com/msmarques


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
PC Magazine gives RoboHelp Office 2002 five stars - a perfect score!
"The ultimate developer's tool for designing help systems. A product
no professional help designer should be without." Check out RoboHelp at
http://www.ehelp.com/techwr
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: re: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
Next by Author: RE: One of those words...
Previous by Thread: Re: More on Validating documentation
Next by Thread: Re: Validating documentation


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads