Another FrameMaker6.0 question

Subject: Another FrameMaker6.0 question
From: "Humphries, Ola" <Ola -dot- Humphries -at- Caminus -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 08:54:02 -0600

Thanks for all who responded to the FrameMaker 6.0 question I posed earlier.
Now, here is one that was not addressed: If I work on a document in
FrameMaker 6.0+SGML without using any of the SGML features, can another
writer using only the plain-jane 6.0 open the document with no problems?
I know that the FrameMaker+SGML can be saved as a mif file and then be
opened in 5.5 or 6.0, but mif files seem to be much larger and I would like
to avoid the mif route if possible.
I can't test this out at the moment as the 6.0 version that has been ordered
for the second writer has not yet arrived. I am working onsite for another
company. My company has furnished me 6.0+ and 5.5, but has not ordered
plain-jane 6.0. The writer from the other company is the one who will get
the 6.0 plain-jane and must maintain the files after I leave.
Thanks again.

Ola Humphries
Technical Writer

PC Magazine gives RoboHelp Office 2002 five stars - a perfect score!
"The ultimate developer's tool for designing help systems. A product
no professional help designer should be without." Check out RoboHelp at
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: FrameMaker6.0 question
Next by Author: Re: PDF Links are not in blue
Previous by Thread: Use of photos in documentation?
Next by Thread: RE: Another FrameMaker6.0 question

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads